参考文献
[1] AGORNI M. Locating systems and individuals in translation studies[C]//WOLF M, FUKARII A. Constructing A Sociology of Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2007: 123-134.
[2] BOURDIEU P. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste[M]. New York and London: Routledge, 1984.
[3] BOURDIEU P. In Other Words[M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990.
[4] BOURDIEU P. Language and Symbolic Power[M]//Trans. RAYMOND G, ADAMSON M. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.
[5] BOURDIEU P. The forms of capital[C]//HALSEY A H, LAUDER H, BROW P et al.. Education, Culture, Economy, Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997: 46-58.
[6] BOURDIEU P, PASSERON J C. Reproduction in Education Society and Culture[M]. London: Sage, 1990.
[7] BOURDIEU P, WACQUANT L. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992.
[8] CHANG N F. In defence of polysystem theory[J]. Target, 2011, 23(2): 311-347.
[9] CHAPMAN R. The language of Thomas Hardy[M]. London: Macmillan, 1990.
[10] CHESTERMAN A. Memes of Translation: The Spread of Ideas in Translation Theory[M]. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1997.
[11] CHESTERMAN A. Description, explanation, prediction: A response to Gideon Toury and Theo Hermans[C].//SCHAFFNER C. Translation and Norms. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1999: 90-97.
[12] EVEN-ZOHAR I. Polysystem theory[J]. Poetics Today, 1990, 11(1): 9-26.
[13] GENTZLER E. Contemporary Translation Theories[M]. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 2001.
[14] GOUANVIC J. A Bourdieusian theory of translation, or the coincidence of practical instances: Field, “habitus”, capital and “illusio”[J]. The Translator, 2005, 11(2): 147-166.
[15] HALVERSON S. The concept of equivalence in translation studies: much ado about something[J]. Target, 1997, 9(2): 207-233.
[16] HERMANS T. Translational norms and correct translations[C]//LEUVEN-ZWART K V, NAAIJKENS T. Translation Studies: The State of the Art. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 1991, 155-170.
[17] HERMANS T. Translation in Systems: Descriptive and System-oriented Approaches Explained[M]. Manchester: St. Jerome, 1999.
[18] INGHAM P. Dialect in the novels of Hardy and George Eliot[C]//WATSON G. Literary English since Shakespeare. Oxford: University Press, 1970: 347-363.
[19] INGHILLERI M. Habitus, field and discourse: Interpreting as a socially situated activity[J]. Target, 2003, 15(2): 243-268.
[20] LANE-MERCIER G. Translating the untranslatable: The translator's aesthetic, ideological and political responsibility[J]. Target, 1997, 9(1): 43-68.
[21] LINDQVIST Y. Consecration mechanisms: —The reconstruction of the Swedish field of high prestige literary translation during the 1980s and 1990s[C]//WOLF M. Übersetzen-Translating-Traduire: Towards a “Social Turn”? Wien: LIT, 2006: 65-75.
[22] MATON K. Habitus[C]//GRENFELL M (Ed.). Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts. Durham: Acumen, 2008: 49-66.
[23] NEMESVARI R. “Genres are not to be mixed... I will not mix them”: discourse, ideology, and generic hybridity in Hardy's fiction[C]//KEITH W. A Companion to Thomas Hardy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009: 102-116.
[24] PYM A. Method in translation history[M]. Manchester: St. Jerome, 1998.
[25] ROUTTI L. Norms and storms: Pentti Saarikoski's translation of J. D. Salinger's The Catcher in the Rye[C]//LEPPIHALME R. Special Issue on Translation Studies. 2001, 1.
[26] SELA-SHEFFY R. How to be a (recognized) translator: rethinking habitus, norms, and the field of translation[J]. Target, 2005, 17(1): 1-26.
[27] SHAFFNER C. The concept of norms in translation studies[C]//SCHAFFNER C. Translation and Norms. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1999: 1-8.
[28] SIMEONI D. The pivotal status of the translator's habitus[J]. Target, 1998, 10(1): 1-39.
[29] TOURY G. Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012.
[30] WOLF M, FUKARI A. Constructing a Sociology of Translation[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[31] 陈国华．论莎剧重译：下[J]．外语教学与研究，1997，3：48-54．
[32] 胡适．胡适日记全集1930—1933[M]．台北：联经出版社．
[33] 李今．二十世纪中国翻译文学史（俄苏卷）[M]．天津：百花文艺出版社，2009．
[34] 梁实秋．论鲁迅先生的硬译[J]．新月，1929，2（6-7）：1-2．
[35] 林辟．两部汉译哈代小说[J]．西书精华，1940，2：115-118．
[36] 鲁迅．鲁迅和瞿秋白关于翻译的通信[C]//罗新璋．翻译论集．北京：商务印书馆，1931/1984：283-279．
[37] 鲁迅．且介亭杂文二集[M]．北京：人民文学出版社，1935／2006．
[38] 茅盾．译文学书方法的讨论[J]．小说月报，1921，12（4）：1-5．
[39] 瞿秋白．普罗大众文艺的现实问题[M]//瞿秋白．文集1．北京：人民文学出版社，1931／1985：461-485．
[40] 任淑坤．五四时期文学翻译风尚的转变[J]．河北大学学报，2013，1：119-123．
[41] 沈曙．读了德伯家的苔丝[J]．华年，1937，6：136-138．
[42] 水同天．适当的文艺翻译[J]．国闻周报，1937，14（17）：35-39．
[43] 宋莉华．19世纪传教士汉语方言小说述略[J]．文学遗产，2012（4）：136-143．
[44] 王恩科．翻译文学经典的建构——以张谷若译《德伯家的苔丝》为例[J]．重庆工商大学学报，2013，30（2）：132-137．
[45] 吴国瑞．德伯家的苔丝[J]．西方语文，1958，2：242-246．
[46] 萧乾．评张译还乡[J]．国闻周报，1937，14（4）：43-49．
[47] 萧乾．再论张译还乡并答译者[J]．国闻周报，1937a, 14（10）：51-54．
[48] 徐蔚南．德伯家的苔丝[J]．青年节，1947，3（1）：1-2．
[49] 余静．从三部作品看文学方言在中国的翻译和出版[J]．翻译季刊，2014（4）：70-92．
[50] 余静．论方言翻译的“落差”策略[J]．中国翻译，2015（2）：107-110．
[51] 余静．迎合与抗争：中国二十世纪五六十年代的文学翻译[J]．翻译学报，2004，9：105-118．
[52] 张谷若．翻译者的态度[J]．北平晨报，1937a, 3月15／22日，5月3／17日．
[53] 张谷若．论翻译：兼答肖君评拙译还乡[J]．国闻周报，1937b, 14（10）：45-59．
[54] 张谷若．译者自序[A]／／哈代．德伯家的苔丝．上海：商务印书馆，1936：Ⅰ-Ⅲ．
[55] 志瑛．一年来的中国翻译界[J]．读书顾问，1935，1（4）：23-24．
[56] 周煦良．马克·吐温[C]／／周煦良．外国文学作品选．上海：上海文艺出版社，1962：61-62．