Lift
上QQ阅读APP看书,第一时间看更新

Psychological States

Ron learned later that the different place he was in was a different psychological state. A psychological state is a current, temporary condition of our mind. It is the pattern of thoughts and feelings we experience at a given point in time.

A person's psychological state can be simple or complex. A simple psychological state, for example, could be described by a single emotion, such as "happy" or "sad." A complex psychological state can include many thoughts and emotions at the same time. For example, if a teenager receives an invitation to take the last spot on the school soccer team but received the invitation because a good friend was kicked off the team, then that teenager's psychological state might involve a complex blend of happiness about the good news, a resolve to succeed, concern for her friend's feelings, fear of the challenge, and guilt for accepting the position.

Scientists who study psychological states seek to understand what kind of states people experience, what leads people to experience particular states, and how these particular states influence other people. This last question is particularly important; as researchers come to understand the answers to it, they are discovering that our psychological states can influence other people in surprising and sometimes even dramatic ways.

Bill, a colleague of ours, told us a personal story that is a good example of this. Bill and his mother did not get along, let alone enjoy each other's company. It had been this way for a long time. In any situation Bill knew what his mother would say, he knew how he would respond, and he knew how the argument would unfold. He hated it, but he could not stop himself.

Bill went to a retreat and ended up working with a counselor. The goal was to improve his relationship with his mother. After much effort he began to feel more positively toward his mother. By the end of the retreat he was anxious to see her. He reports the following experience:


I took a deep breath and walked into the kitchen. I saw her before she saw me. I thought about the sacrifices she made and how much I loved her. She turned and looked at me. She opened her mouth. My stomach tightened and I thought, "Here it comes." She paused and smiled. Then she went on with what she was doing. I was stunned. That was not what she was supposed to do. I was different and now she was different. From then on the relationship totally changed. I had not said a word, but I was different, and somehow she sensed it.This story was recorded first in R. E. Quinn, Change the World: How Ordinary People Can Accomplish Extraordinary Results (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000), 123–24.


Bill's relationship with his mother changed without his saying a word because Bill was in a different psychological state. At the retreat he had worked hard to consciously appreciate her positive characteristics and the sacrifices she had made over many years. This less angry and more loving orientation was probably communicated in his facial expression, his posture, and other nonverbal ways. These nonverbal signals of love and appreciation provided Bill's mother with a new set of cues to interpret. When people receive unexpected cues from others—particularly unexpected emotional cues—they have to make sense of them in new ways.Research suggests, for example, that when one person speaks to another, listeners receive 12.5 times as much information, on average, from the speakers' nonverbal cues as they do from the speakers' actual words, and that people believe the nonverbal cues more than they believe the verbal ones. This makes unexpected nonverbal cues even more important for people to make sense of than verbal ones. See J. K. Burgoon, “Nonverbal Signals,” in Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, ed. M. L. Knapp and G. R. Miller, 2nd ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994), 229–85; and J. K. Burgoon, “Nonverbal Communication Research in the 1970s: An Overview,” in Communication Yearbook, ed. D. Nimmo (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1980), 179–97. Thus, without saying a word to his mother, Bill had begun to construct a new relationship. The change in his relationship began with a change in his psychological state.

Our psychological states, whether they influence others positively or negatively, do so in at least four ways:


1. Our facial expressions, body language, and tone of voice send new and unexpected cues that people interpret and react to in new and different ways.

2. The emotions that are part of our psychological states are contagious. In other words, people often unconsciously mimic and then adopt our feelings.Scientists call this emotional contagion. For a description of the process, see E. Hatfield, J. T. Cacioppo, and R. L. Rapson, “Primitive Emotional Contagion,” in Emotion and Social Behavior, vol. 14: Review of Personality and Social Psychology, ed. M. S. Clark (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992), 151–77.

3. Psychological states sometimes lead us to make different decisions or act in different ways than we would if we had been in a different psychological state, and other people are influenced by these decisions and actions.Donald A. Schön, for example, describes how the reflectiveness with which professionals do their work affects how artfully their decisions are made; see Schön, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (New York: Basic Books, 1983). Alice Isen's research on emotions and creativity suggest that people will make more creative decisions or perform more creatively depending on their psychological states; see A. M. Isen, “Positive Affect and Creativity,” in Affect, Creative Experience, and Psychological Adjustment, ed. S. Russ, 3–17 (Philadelphia: Bruner/Masel, 1999). Other examples can be given as well.

4. When we take different actions and perform them in different ways, we also generate different results—results that may be more or less effective, creative, or beneficial. People pay attention to and try to make sense of unusual results.Large and small successes and other extraordinary results draw other people's attention and add legitimacy to what a person is doing; see J. Collins, Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap … and Others Don't (New York: Harper Business, 2001); and K. Weick, “Small Wins: Redefining the Scale of Social Problems,” American Psychologist 39 (1984): 40–49.


Ron's leadership exhibited all of these forms of influence. For example, when Ron felt positive, his coworkers had to make sense of his positive feelings—especially when Ron was positive during difficult times. The energy he brought to his activities was contagious, and it lifted others. Because of how he felt toward others, he might listen carefully in situations where others would feel compelled to argue their points. And because he achieved exceptional results, people wanted to learn from him or be a part of his team.

Our psychological states influence other people, and their psychological states influence us; we are relational beings.See, for example, M. Emirbayer, “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology,” American Journal of Sociology 103, no. 2 (1997): 281–317. Our psychological states are the sum of who we are at a given moment as we play out the stories of our lives in relation to others. Therefore, who we are at any time depends on who the people around us are, and who they are depends on who we are. The psychological state that Ron experienced in the staffing meeting affected how he experienced himself and acted as a manager, a coworker, and a friend. It also affected how positively other people experienced themselves in similar roles.

Typically, the influence that we exert upon each other tends to reinforce the conventions and norms to which we are already accustomed. However, if we experience a positive psychological state that defies some convention or norm, we may lead people into entirely new ways of relating and performing.

Our purpose in this book is to propose a specific psychological state that can make us a positive influence upon those around us in any situation. We call this the fundamental state of leadership. When we experience the fundamental state of leadership, we tend to lift both ourselves and those around us.