Lift
上QQ阅读APP看书,第一时间看更新

The Four Questions

Ron struggled to explain his claim that he had given his power away, but he was unable to do so. He knew things intuitively that he could not explicitly explain. A few weeks after the meeting Ron attended a training program for business executives titled "Leading the Positive Organization." In this program he learned about an area of research called positive organizational scholarship that examines the best of organizations and the best of human behavior in organizations.See K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, and R. E. Quinn, Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2003). It is similar to positive psychology, in which researchers seek to understand positive emotions, strengths, and virtues and how human strengths can contribute to better communities.See M. E. P. Seligman, Authentic Happiness: Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment (New York: Free Press, 2002). The professors and participants in the training program that Ron attended discussed topics such as how to create a culture that helps organizations and their people to thrive, tools for fostering high-quality relationships in the workplace, ways to energize the organization, and new ways to think about positive leadership. Ron learned about the fundamental state of leadership in this program.

The fundamental state of leadership drew Ron's attention because he recognized it in his own experience: such a state of leadership was the "place" that he was no longer in, and was the "power" that he had given up. He also recognized that the reason he had experienced the fundamental state of leadership so often in his work prior to the staffing meeting was that a series of difficult life events had pushed him to rise to the occasion and be his best self. This worried him; what if he could only experience the fundamental state of leadership when critical circumstances called him to do so? What about the rest of his work and life? Given this concern, Ron felt empowered when he learned four questions, developed from scientific research, that could help him experience the fundamental state of leadership in any situation:


1. What result do I want to create? When people answer this question they become less comfort-centered and more purpose-centered.

2. What would my story be if I were living the values I expect of others? When people answer this question they become less externally directed and more internally directed.

3. How do others feel about this situation? When people answer this question they become less self-focused and more other-focused.

4. What are three or more strategies I could try in learning how to accomplish my purpose? When people answer this question they become less internally closed and more externally open.


These are not magic questions. There are other questions, methods, or circumstances that can also help you experience the fundamental state of leadership. We offer examples of such questions in table 1.1. But we use these four questions throughout this book because they are carefully worded to reflect the scientific understanding we have of this psychological state. Our purpose for writing this book is to give you these questions. When people ask and answer them, they tend to move out of a normal psychological state and into the fundamental state of leadership, lifting themselves and others.

When Ron learned that he could experience the fundamental state of leadership by answering the four questions, he began using them to experience the state as often as possible. For example, after the training, Ron was supposed to attend a meeting in which he and his coworkers would make decisions about employee pay. These decisions were more complicated than usual because Ron's company had just been acquired by another company. The two companies had different forms and procedures for paying people, but there were no directions about how to handle the different forms and procedures. In fact, these forms and procedures were just one of many problems caused by the acquisition of Ron's company. There were no instructions for dealing with any of these problems, and Ron's boss—who was their contact with the parent company—was afraid to ask for directions. Ron worried that all these problems would make the compensation meeting a frustrating waste of time.

TABLE 1.1 Alternate Questions for Experiencing the Fundamental State of Leadership

Becoming Purpose-Centered

What result do I want to create?

What is my highest purpose for this situation?

What goal would be the most challenging and engaging?

What outcome would be most meaningful to me?

What would be the most ambitious and exciting goal I could pursue?


Becoming Internally Directed

What would my story be if I were living up to the values I expect of others?

What would I do if I had 10% more integrity than I have right now?

How can l live my core values in this situation?

What could I do right now to be more authentic?

If I were not worried about negative consequences, what would be the right thing to do?


Becoming Other-Focused

How do others feel about this situation?

What might be the deepest, unmet needs of those who care about this situation?

How could I explain others' behavior if I assume that they think they are good people?

How would I feel about others if I could empathize with their truest selves?

How and what could I sacrifice for the common good?

Becoming Externally Open

What are three or more strategies I could try in learning how to accomplish my purpose?

What would I do differently if I were heeding all of the relevant feedback for this situation?

How would I act if I were not concerned about my role, expertise, or need for control?

How might I approach this situation if I saw it as an opportunity to learn?

How might I approach this situation if I saw it as an adventure with challenges to overcome?

How could I reframe negative outcomes as feedback from which I should learn?

Ron prepared himself for the meeting by asking himself the four questions. The agenda for the meeting was to decide how to pay employees, but this agenda was problem-focused given the companies' conflicting procedures and lack of direction. When Ron asked himself the first question, he decided that the result he wanted to create was to come up with an approach for working with the new company regarding how to pay employees that people in both companies could stand behind and work on together.

Ron then asked himself the second question, determined not to react automatically and get frustrated with people while he was in the meeting. When he did he realized that the value that he expected from his boss was candor: he wanted his boss to have a straight conversation with the people in the other company so that they could find out what they needed to know. As a result, he decided that he should speak to his boss with as much candor as he expected the boss to speak with when he met with people in the parent company.

When Ron asked himself the third question he stopped seeing his boss (and others in the meeting) as either tools to help him achieve his goals or as obstacles preventing him from doing so. Instead he empathized with the pressure that his boss probably felt in approaching the people in the company that had just acquired theirs. Because of this empathy he wanted to support his boss as well as to be frank with him.

When Ron asked the fourth question, he stopped worrying about what feedback he might get for taking initiative in the meeting, or what feedback he and his coworkers might receive from the other company. Instead he was open to using many different strategies for developing new approaches to paying employees and was eager to learn which approach might be the best.

When Ron entered the meeting, his boss began to work through his agenda. He suggested that the group should make the best decisions they could with the information they had. Ron asked if he could stop the meeting. He asked if the group could discuss what they needed to achieve that afternoon. He suggested that the group try to come up with an approach for paying employees that would work out well for both companies and their employees in the long run. As they did this, Ron's boss remembered new and relevant information that he learned from the parent company but had forgotten to share. This helped the group to more clearly adapt and specify what additional information it needed to move forward. Once the group was clear about what it needed, Ron's boss agreed to ask the managers in the parent company for more information. When he talked to the managers from the acquiring company, the conversation went well. They were impressed by the boss's clarity and objectives.

Before Ron's boss brought their questions to the managers in the other company, Ron and his colleagues had believed that the managers from the acquiring company displayed a demeaning attitude toward them. After Ron's boss talked to these managers, however, the feeling changed. Employees from the acquiring company began to invite people from Ron's company to give input and to help them design the integration of the two companies.

Ron was thrilled by this experience and others like it. He now uses the four questions on a regular basis. He is increasingly purpose-centered, internally directed, other-focused, and externally open, lifting himself, his coworkers, and his organization.

Anyone can do what Ron did. Social science and practical experiences help us understand how people can lift themselves and others, how people can experience this more often, why asking these four questions can change a person's psychological state, and how one person's psychological state influences that of other people. Our first step in learning the answers to these questions begins with a description of the metaphor behind the science we present and an explanation for why the four characteristics are all necessary for a person to lift themselves and others. This step of the journey occurs in chapter 2.

FUNDAMENTAL STATE OF LEADERSHIP PRACTICES

Sometimes during the swirl of daily life people struggle to pause and ask themselves the four questions or to remember what they are. Here are some suggestions that people have used to deal with these challenges:

1. Identify critical activities and schedule a preparation time. One of our colleagues decided that he wanted to be a positive leader in his meetings at work. On his calendar he scheduled ten minutes before every meeting to ask himself the four questions. We can use the same principle in any recurring activity. You can also do this using the Breakthrough tool on Lift Exchange (http://www.liftexchange.com/breakthrough). This tool enables you to join either a public and free or private and paid community of people who practice the fundamental state of leadership, to make plans, to report on your efforts, and learn from others' reports.

2. Put a coin in your shoe. Another way to remember to pause and ask the four questions is to create a spontaneous reminder. You could put a coin in your shoe and ask the four questions whenever you feel the coin move. You could also wear a bracelet, a ring, or tie a string around your finger.

3. Pay attention to tense emotions. If we feel strong, tense emotions like anger or fear, and we are not facing any physical danger, then there is a good chance that our influence in that situation will not be positive. Strong, tense emotions are often a good signal for telling us when we should stop and ask the four questions.

4. Print the four questions on an index card. If you have trouble remembering the questions, you can print them out on a card. Carry it with you in a wallet or purse, or tape it to your computer or your refrigerator.

5. Give other people permission to call you out. If it is hard to be a positive influence in particular types of situations, and there are people you trust who are often involved in those situations, tell them about your desire to be a more positive influence. Give them permission to ask you to pause if they think you are in that type of situation and you are not being a positive influence. This technique not only has the advantage of helping you to pause but can also help you to be more accountable for the influence you have on others. It can help other people feel like it is okay to learn from mistakes because of the example you are setting.

6. Use a mnemonic. You can also use a LIFT mnemonic to remember the questions, such as:

List strategies: "What are three or more strategies I could try in learning how to accomplish my purpose?"

Increase integrity: "What would my story be if I were living the values I expect of others?"

Feel empathy: "How do others feel about this situation?"

Think of results: "What result do I want to create?"

Legacy: "What result do I want to create?"

If … : "What would my story be if I were living the values I expect of others?"

Feelings: "How do others feel about this situation?"

Tactics: "What are three or more strategies I could try in learning how to accomplish my purpose?"